<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: airBaltic is violating FlyLAL&#8217;s trademark in Google AdWords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.klintoe.org/2007/09/16/airbaltic-is-violating-flylals-trademark-in-google-adwords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.klintoe.org/2007/09/16/airbaltic-is-violating-flylals-trademark-in-google-adwords/</link>
	<description>Blogging by a happy boy, Niels Klintø</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niels Klintø</title>
		<link>http://www.klintoe.org/2007/09/16/airbaltic-is-violating-flylals-trademark-in-google-adwords/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels Klintø</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klintoe.org/2007/09/16/airbaltic-is-violating-flylals-trademark-in-google-adwords/#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>And another link in English:
&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.baltictimes.com/news/articles/18845/" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Baltic Times on Airbaltic's violation&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another link in English:<br />
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.baltictimes.com/news/articles/18845/" rel="nofollow">The Baltic Times on Airbaltic&#8217;s violation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels Klintø</title>
		<link>http://www.klintoe.org/2007/09/16/airbaltic-is-violating-flylals-trademark-in-google-adwords/#comment-2748</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels Klintø</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klintoe.org/2007/09/16/airbaltic-is-violating-flylals-trademark-in-google-adwords/#comment-2748</guid>
		<description>Hi Jack!

Yeah, it is shocking that a rather large company like airBaltic is involved in a misuse of trademark on Google AdWords - I guess it because it's rather easy to advertise there (and include competitors brands - in some cases) and not everybody cares or gives trademarks a thought.... but these people forget that the proofs are very easy accessible (screenshots and Google's helpfull staff) - airBaltic will remember now...

Niels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack!</p>
<p>Yeah, it is shocking that a rather large company like airBaltic is involved in a misuse of trademark on Google AdWords - I guess it because it&#8217;s rather easy to advertise there (and include competitors brands - in some cases) and not everybody cares or gives trademarks a thought&#8230;. but these people forget that the proofs are very easy accessible (screenshots and Google&#8217;s helpfull staff) - airBaltic will remember now&#8230;</p>
<p>Niels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.klintoe.org/2007/09/16/airbaltic-is-violating-flylals-trademark-in-google-adwords/#comment-2747</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klintoe.org/2007/09/16/airbaltic-is-violating-flylals-trademark-in-google-adwords/#comment-2747</guid>
		<description>So AirBaltic thought they could just use FlyLAL's brand as their keyword - how unprofessional is that by AirBaltic?

Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So AirBaltic thought they could just use FlyLAL&#8217;s brand as their keyword - how unprofessional is that by AirBaltic?</p>
<p>Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
